In several European countries such as France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland, marriage agreements have long been considered valid. While in some of these countries, limits apply to restrictions enforceable or valid by the courts (for example. B Germany after 2001, when the appelncies courts indicated it), a written and duly initiated contract, which was freely concluded, cannot be challenged, for example by arguing the circumstances in which the marriage broke down or where the marriage reigned. In France and Belgium (as in Quebec, which has the same judicial tradition), marital agreements must be concluded in the presence of a notary. The 2014 Report of the Legal Commission on Marital Property accepted the decision in cyclists in general and recommended the creation by Parliament of a „qualifying marriage agreement“ that would create a fully binding pre-marital agreement as long as certain requirements were met. The Commission`s recommendations have yet to be implemented. Marriage contracts are recognized in Australia by the Family Law Act of 1975 (Commonwealth).  In Australia, a marriage contract is called binding financial agreement (BFA).  In England and Wales, pre-marriage agreements had not been considered legally enforceable, as justice had not been dismissed on public policy grounds.
The canonical law: the letter and the spirit, a commentary on canon law, states that the condition can be defined as „a provision by which an agreement is subject to verification or the fulfillment of a circumstance or event that is not yet certain.“ He added: „Any future condition related to conjugal consent invalidates the marriage.“ For example, a marriage would not be valid if the parties prescribed that they must have children, or they had the right to divorce and remarry. [Citation required] In a 1990 California case, the Court of Appeal imposed an oral marriage in the estate of one of the parties because the surviving spouse had significantly changed his position according to the verbal agreement.  However, as a result of amendments to the act, it has become much more difficult to change the character of community or distinct property without written agreement.  There are several ways to sue a marriage. These include lack of volunteerism, lack of scruples and lack of disclosure of assets.  In all U.S. states, it is not permissible to address issues relating to children of marriage, particularly custody and access issues.  The reason is that children`s issues must be decided in the best interests of children.
 However, this is controversial: some people think that, as custody disputes are often the worst part of a divorce, couples should be able to settle this in advance.  While the laws enacted by the states that adopt the UPAA/UPMA have some state-to-state differences, this legislative framework has certainly made it much easier for lawyers to prepare enforceable marriage contracts for clients by clearly defining the requirements. For example, under Florida law, there is a very significant difference in what is needed to enter into a legally binding marriage agreement compared to a post-marriage agreement in.